Blog

Follow-up on IM interoperability in consumer space



I was finally attempting to catch up one some trade magazines and there was another article on Microsoft, AOL and Yahoo forming the partnership for LCS 2005 to work with each other.  But here is what caught my eye in the whole thing (Network World Jul 19 2004):

An IBM/Lotus spokesman says the company is not seeing customer demand for integration with consumer IM networks.  The demand is to integrate IM with business applications.

While I buy that the demand is much higher to get the presence integrated into applications, I cannot see why companies would not want this feature.  You then centralize and control versioning and deployed software in the company, while providing the necessary filtering and monitoring.  All through one client that already integrates into your applications.  Plus you can get into namespace mapping to know exactly who you and your employees are talking to.  This paragraph could on and on, but then why make everyone fuzzy eyed?

Am I missing something here that I would not want this?